Sandrine Berges
  • Home
  • Liberty in thy name!
  • The Philosophy of Domesticity
    • The Home: A Philosophical Project
  • Women Philosophers Calendars
  • Research
  • Public Philosophy
  • Events
    • Wollstonecraft at Bilkent
    • Bridging the Gender Gap Through Time
    • Wollapalooza
    • Wollapalooza II
  • Historical zombies and other fiction
  • Teaching
  • Crafts and things
  • Feminist History of Philosophy

Liberty in their Names

Get the Free Calendar
Order the book!

Trolling the women of the Revolution

3/28/2018

0 Comments

 
Looking for mentions of Sophie de Grouchy in the 18th century press, I came up against an extremely unpleasant text which would find a home today on the worst alt-right threads. 
These were unpleasant to translate, and I expect they'll be unpleasant to read - unless you are accustomed to aforementioned threads - so brace yourselves. 

The text comes from a royalist journal by a M. Suleau, who, having praised aristocratic ladies for their anti-revolutionary attitude goes to lists exceptions: 
​
There are of course, exceptions amongst the old, the ugly, the infirm, whatever class they belong to. I have carefully verified that of all the women who harnessed themselves to the cart (or more correctly, the tipcart) of the Revolution, there is not a single one that does not belong to this disgusting category.
A few toothless and disgusting dowagers (starting with the duchess of Anville) allowed their folly to persuade them that the Revolution was a talisman of youth,  to throw themselves in the torrent of novelty, thinking in their folly that that famous system of equality, which first wishes to bring all humans back to the infancy of beautiful nature, would necessarily have the virtue to wipe away their wrinkles, and to refresh their fusty attractions.
The ugly, starting with the rotund Stael, thought that by painting themselves with the colours of the nation they would in turn take on a human appearance, and that by piling on tricolour fripperies, they would succeed in hiding their deformities.
In the lepers’ infirmary, I would place (starting with the Condorcet woman) these young meats who, with a varnish of health and engaging figures still chose to throw themselves in the rights of men cooking pot. We must not be mistaken: despite their fresh faces and eager demeanors, these poor creatures are infertile and covered in ulcers, mange, gripe, ring worm, the clap, sores, yaws, farcy, bleb on their necks, suction cups on their chests, poultices on their thighs, and plasters everywhere – we find such pleasant accouterments behind all the pretty faces who gave themselves to the cult of demagogy. These unfortunates, to make things worse, are periodically subject to epileptic fits. I am not worried that any of these interesting dolls will dare to contradict me, for I will call to witness a legion of sans-culottes who have been in a position to verify this by eye and by hand. 
Francois-Louis Suleau is described in the French Wikipedia article dedicated to him as a passionate defender of monarchy, a provocateur, one who would not accept compromise and  bravely attempted to convince first Mirabeau, then Danton and Robespierre to preserve the monarchy. 

Readers will no doubt be sad to hear that this noble individual came to a violent and inglorious end at the age of 34, massacred by the crowds in front of the Tuileries on August 10 because they'd mistaken him for another - more influential - counter revolutionary journalist. 
0 Comments

'I stay away from politics' - Manon's change of heart

3/20/2018

0 Comments

 
Although she became a political thinker at a very early age – eight, if we believe her memoirs, being the age she discovered Plutarch and decided she too was a republican – Manon did not become interested in politics until the Revolution. That is, she was interested in political theory, but felt that these were so distant from the shenanigans at Versailles that her interest had to remain political. In the early 1780s, Manon Roland had lost all illusions that the world would ever be ruled in a just manner.

​In 1783, she wrote to her friend Champagneux: 
​Virtue, liberty, are only to be found in the hearts of a small number of decent people; to hell with the others and all the thrones in the world!
[..] I stay away from politics [...] and all I can tell you about are the dogs that wake me in the morning, the birds that comfort for no longer being asleep, the cherry trees that grow under my windows and the cows that chew the grass in the garden. 
​But from the very start of the revolution, when she was recovering from pneumonia and writing powerful letters to her friends in Paris, advising and admonishing as to what had to be done, Manon became fully involved. She wrote letters and newspapers articles, and helped Jean-Marie find a position for himself that would allow them to participate more fully. As soon as it became possible the Rolands moved to Paris. In June 1791, she wrote to her friend Bancal explaining her transformation:
​While peace lasted, I kept myself to the tranquil role and the kind of influence that seem to me proper for my sex. But when the King’s departure declared war, it struck me that we must all devote ourselves without reserve; I went and joined the Fraternal Societies, persuaded that zeal and right thinking can sometimes be very useful in times of crisis. I cannot keep to my home and am visiting all my acquaintances in order to excite us for the greatest actions.
0 Comments

Manon's Academic Adventure

3/14/2018

0 Comments

 
In 1777, the Académie of Besançon proposed an essay competition with the following question: How can educating women contribute to the improvement of men? Such competitions were common at the time, a way both for the provincial academies to make themselves known throughout the country, and for fledgling writers to get published.
 
Competitions were especially rife during the decades preceeding the Revolution, with 357 between 1770 and 1779, that is, more than 35 per year. As well as Jean-Jacques Rousseau, whose career as a writer took off when he won the Academy of Dijon competition with his Discourse on the Arts and Sciences in 1749, many famous names of that time entered and won academic competitions, such as Jean-Francois Marmontel, novelist and friend of Olympe, Jacques Pierre Brissot, Abbe Gregoire and Jean-Paul Marat to edit.
​Manon’s first mention of her academic project to her friend Sophie Cannet is very brief, and almost blustery – look at all the crazy things I’m trying to do, she seems to say – none of them will come to anything:
​14 January 1777
I have never found myself with some many ongoing projects, and so little disposition to work at them. I am a bit like those project makers who never perform and always plan. I have begun an academic discourse: ahem! That is no small affair; I have sketched out a metaphysical dissertation, I am mapping out in my head a little philosophical novel. My mind is wandering from the one to the others, caressing them in turns, and then forgetting them, and does not move forward in anything.  
​In April she sent it the Academy, and in June, still waiting for an answer, she told her friend about it: 
​21 June 1777
Would you be surprised if, as a reply to your jokes, I were to send you my academic laurels, that I had picked behind your back? No such thing happened, and I jest. I would have to wait too long to let it be a surprise, I would not have the courage to keep quiet about my efforts for six months, for instance. We will know in October, through a public announcement, what happened on 1 May at the Academy of Besancon. Do you think that if I had sent a discourse at that time that I would be able to stop myself telling you then? It is hard not to tell one’s friend, the custodian of one’s follies. So I will tell you that a certain paper fell into my hands by chance, a few months ago, and I saw the advertisement of the said Academy, offering this question: “How could educating women contribute to the improvement of men?” I was struck, I dreamt, I wrote, amidst all the worries that my mind is perpetually subject to. I made a small discourse, and without showing it, without discussing it with anyone at all, I sent if off in April, under, by the way, the anonymity that suits me, and that I want to keep whatever happens. I am ignorant of the decision that was made, and I do not hope for much. The republic of Letters would have to be poor in clever skillful members for there not to better answers than mine on such an important question. If I get the chance, I will send you this little scribbling.
​It turned out nobody won. Bernardin de Saint Pierre, Rousseau’s disciple, and author of the novel Paul and Virginie, got an honorary mention.
0 Comments

The King's (unofficial) Advocate

3/7/2018

0 Comments

 
On 15 January 1793, Louis Capet, previously King of France, is found guilty by an overwhelming majority of the 749 deputies. Two days later, the deputies are asked to vote for a penalty. 346 vote for the death penalty. Others, including Thomas Paine, who had been offered honorary French citizenship, vote for exile, or for imprisonement. 
.
Picture
One citizen, who had not voted, argued against the death penalty. Olympe de Gouges started by offering herself as Louis’s unofficial advocate on 16 December, arguing at first that while as a King, he had done harm to the people of France by his very existence, once Royalty had been abolished, he was no longer guilty.
​As king, I believe Louis to be in the wrong, but take away this proscribed title and he ceases to be guilty, in the eyes of the republic.
Does Louis the Last threaten the republic more than his brothers, or his son? His brothers are still united with the foreign powers and only work on their own behalf. Louis Capet’s son is innocent, and will survive his father. 
Louis Capet’s greatest crime, it must be conceded, was to be born a king at a time when philosophy was silently laying the foundations of the republic. (http://www.olympedegouges.eu/defenseur_officieux.php)
Picture
This proposal, written as a letter to the Convention, was then printed as a placard and distributed throughout Paris. The Convention disregarded the letter. Sèze was made Louis’ advocate, and the argument that Gouges put forward was not taken into consideraton. Louis Capet, stripped of his title, was still tried for high treason, i.e. for actions he had performed while he was still King of France.
Olympe did not stop at this. On 18 January, after the King had been found guilty, but before his death had been voted, she put up another placard addressed to the Convention and to the people of Paris, entitled “Decree of Death against Louis Capet, presented by Olympe de Gouges.” In this piece she also attempted to dispel the mistaken impression that she was in fact a royalist.
​
​Louis dead will still enslave the Universe. Louis alive will break the chains of the Universe by smashing the sceptres of his equals. If they resist? Well! Let a noble despair immortalize us. It has been said, with reason, that our situation is neither like that of the English nor the Romans. I have a great example to offer posterity; here it is: Louis' son is innocent, but he could be a pretender to the crown and I would like to deny him all pretension. Therefore I would like Louis, his wife, his children and all his family to be chained in a carriage and driven into the heart of our armies, between the enemy fire and our own artillery. (http://www.olympedegouges.eu/decree_of_death.php)
​Here Gouges is appealing to a well-known fact about the workings of royalism: a King cannot die. The holder of the title may die, but the title passes automatically to the next contender, without, even, the necessity of sacrament. The immortality of the king was such an important precept that a Chancelier, when a monarch died, could not wear mourning. Bossuet captured the phenomenon thus in his Mirror for Kings: 



​​You die as men. Nevermind, you are gods, and even though you do die, your authority does not [...] The man dies, it is true; but the king, we say, does not: the image of God is immortal”. (Sur les Devoirs des Rois). 
Picture
Letting Louis live, she would go on to argue in her final published piece, 'Les trois urnes'. would have made it clear that he was no longer a threat to the republic - as no one individual is. To execute him is both to betray a certain lack of confidence in whether the people have truly succeeded in aboloshing the monarchy, and perpetuate that doubt, as after Louis's death, his title is transferred to his descendent. 
0 Comments

    About

    This is where I live blog about my new book project, an intellectual biography of three French Revolutionary women philosophers.

    Categories

    All
    1789
    1793
    Abolitionism
    America
    Biography
    Bonheur Primitif
    Brissot
    Cabanis
    Champ De Mars Massacre
    Charity
    Charlotte Corday
    Childhood
    Conciergerie
    Condorcet
    Declaration Of The Rights Of Man
    Dumont
    Education
    England
    Eon
    Feminism
    Frances Wright
    Gender
    Germaine De Stael
    Ghostwriting
    Guillotine
    Haiti
    Hannah Mather Crocker
    Helvetius
    HIstorians
    Journalism
    La Fayette
    Les Trois Urnes
    Letters
    Letters On Sympathy
    Louise Keralio
    Macaualy
    Manon Roland
    Mary Shelley
    Memoir
    Olympe De Gouges
    Paine
    Painting
    Paris
    Pregnancy
    Prison
    Religion
    Roland
    Rousseau
    Saint-Domingue
    Salons
    September Massacres
    Sexism
    Sieyes
    Slavery
    Sophie De Grouchy
    Terror
    Theatre
    The Great Fear
    Theroigne De Mericourt
    Translation
    Trial
    Wollstonecraft

    Archives

    November 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    March 2021
    February 2021
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017

    RSS Feed

Proudly powered by Weebly
  • Home
  • Liberty in thy name!
  • The Philosophy of Domesticity
    • The Home: A Philosophical Project
  • Women Philosophers Calendars
  • Research
  • Public Philosophy
  • Events
    • Wollstonecraft at Bilkent
    • Bridging the Gender Gap Through Time
    • Wollapalooza
    • Wollapalooza II
  • Historical zombies and other fiction
  • Teaching
  • Crafts and things
  • Feminist History of Philosophy